| |
|
Is there any validity to this claim? Let's explore this topic as objectively and as unemotionally as possible.
Now, obviously there are plenty of outright racists who believe this to be 100% true. But even still, are there at least some truths hidden in this thesis? Lets look at some facts:
-A disproportionate amount of Jewish people seem to be in high positions of the media. Michael Eisner runs Disney and ABC, Hollywood has a signifigant Jewish influence, the New York Times is run by the Sulzbergers, etc. But there is a historical reason for some of this, as lots of persecuted Jews went to California in the 1800s and founded Hollywood. As for Jewish influence of New York, that city has more Jews than anywhere else in the world so there is bound to be people in positions of power there.(Israel on a whole has a larger Jewish population, but no one city even has as large a population as just the amount of Jewish people in New York)
-Jewish people also seem to have large amounts of banking interest in the world. Of course conspiracy theorists will cite the Rothschilds and 'international bankers.' There is also a historical reason for this, since going all the way back to medievel times in Europe it was against Church law to charge interest on loans so many monarchies would indirectly do that through Jewish people that did not have to follow Church law, so it sort of evolved that way. And later on, it should be pointed out, the Knights Templar also got in on control through banking later on.
-When you look at politics, Jewish people can often be in the center of situations. Many of the early communists where Jewish, such as of course Marx but also many of the early Russian groups. In America Jewish people are 15% of Congress, which has them overrepresented by a factor of three. And obviously Israel is a major center of world events right now.
But what does this all mean. Are Jews God's chosen people? (maybe, but let me get back to that point later) Are the part of the New World Order? Are the examples above just the random way that history evolved? Well, one theory has it that Jewish people were sort of bred to be more intelligent than Europeans. My own belief is that it is far more cultural than genetic, but how it goes is that when Christianity took over Europe, the smartest and most educated Europeans would become clergy. Hence, they would be celibate and have no children. But in the Jewish portions of Europe of that time, Jewish culture had it that the most educated and intelligent people would have the MOST children, and be the most rewarded in society. So Europeans were bred stupid, culturally or genetically whichever you prefer, until the Rennaisance when they caught up with the rest of the world and took over it. But even today, especially in America, Jewish culture respects education moreso than the many parts of the rest of the culture at large. There is no malicious planning in this.
But let us now bring up the subject of conspiracy theorism. My own conclusion is that more is being done behind the scenes than we will ever know, but the closest we can get to the truth is to at least explore and take consideration in conspiracy theories.
What I have concluded is not that there is THE Jewish conspiracy, but that there is 'A' Jewish conspriracy. You see, the biggest flaw of conspiracy theorists is that when they look at the big picture, they conclude that it is all one major plan. But more likely, it is far less organized and there are different hidden groups infighting and crisscrossing. The Jewish influence on whatever 'NWO' their might be is just one influence. There is also an Arabic influence when you look at the Assasin secret societies influence on the Illuminati, there are Arabic bloodlines and CIA connections (Bin Laden AND Hussein). Obviously, WASPs have a large stake in this. Look at most of our presidents, they are old money/royalty families. But let me come back to bloodlines in a moment. When both men running for president are both Skull and Bones members, something is going on and it is bigger than any 'Jewish Conspiracy.' Besides the interlocking of different groups, there is also apperently infighting between PNAC NeoCons and the U.N., right-wing capitolists vs. left-wing communists, Zionists vs. Muslims, etc. It is much bigger and more random than only one of these groups influencing everything behind the scenes.
One the subject of bloodlines, those that control the world do appear to be the same families that have been doing so for hundreds, if not thousands, of years. Bush, who is so obviously only president because his father was, is the 17th cousin of Saddam Hussein. So Jewish people that have too much influence on the world may be so because of this reason, they are of just one bloodline that happens to be Jewish. But why is it that bloodlines seem to exert so much influence? Is it just how history happens to evolve, or is their something more? One of the more outlandish theories is that Anunnaki E.T.s are the gods of ancient religions and interbred with humanity. So could those in power be of alien extraction? Is this what is meant by God's Chosen People? We will probibly never know for sure (and this goes for both sides of this debate) but it is something we should consider and not immeadiately discount.
Now I would like to get into something as taboo as taboo gets: Holocaust revisionism. Did six million die? Whether or not they did, Zionism since then has certainly taken advantage of the Holocaust for their own political gain. There is also much evidence that Zionists worked with the Nazis to forcibly deport all Jews to Palestine but Britain would not allow it. I am in no way a Nazi sympathizer, but I would still like to explore this topic. Let us consider Holocaust revisionism for the moment. Hypothetically, let's say that the number of Jews that died was only in the hundreds of thousands, and there were no gas chambers, and most of the deaths were due to starvation from Allied bombings. The remaining historical record is still shows an extremely evil track record for the Nazi regime. The government controlled the country fascistically, invaded its neighbors for purely imperial reasons, and had a lawful policy of racial discrimination, where "only" hundreds of thousands/millions were put into concentration camps. And of course, it was not just Jewish people that were persecuted, but also the mentally ill, Gypsies, political prisoners, homosexuals, and anyone who did not listen to the regime. The stupidity of Nazi sympathizers stems from saying these people were the good guys, even when you accept the revisionism arguments, just because they were fighting the 'Jewish/Communist Conspiracy.' As I said, if there is a conspiracy it must be much bigger than that, and of course the occultic dictator Nazi party would be completely a part of it. Look also at the CIA heavy Nazi influence in the Cold War. Not to mention the Bush family's connections to Nazi Germany durring this time period.
Even still, can we at least look at World War II revisionism with an open-mind? Can the beliefs of sympathizers be compartmentalized and only look at the factual evidence of what they have dug up? My own philosophy of spiritual enlightenment is to be as open-minded as possible and to challenge everything. When someone is fanatic about hating this taboo of Holocaust denial, it can make their ideas even more enticing. But most of all we should be logical and look at what the facts are, but not emotionally condemn others. The fact that Ernst Zundel is in jail in Canada for these reasons is also a travesty of free-speach.
I don't like to play this card, but I probibly should after saying all this. I happen to have been born in Israel, and I still have dual Israeli citizenship. By ethnicity I am Jewish, but not by religion. I can tell you by experience that no one I know runs the world, I wish I could get a free ride in life if it were true. But my ethnicity should not matter, and feel free to call me a self-hating Jew, but what should matter is the objectivity of the truth. I am just trying to explore every avenue possible to get to it, and social taboos should not play into it.
I welcome any discussion. |
|
|
